Macksofy Technologies
Quantitative + Qualitative · Board-Ready

Cybersecurity Risk Assessment

Know what to fix first. With math.

Cybersecurity risk assessment using quantitative methods (FAIR) and qualitative frameworks (ISO 27005, NIST 800-30). Outcome: a prioritized risk register your board can act on, not a 200-page document nobody reads.

Aligned to
  • FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk)
  • ISO 27005:2022
  • NIST SP 800-30
  • OCTAVE Allegro
Why this matters

Compliance is leverage, not paperwork.

Most risk assessments produce paperwork, not decisions. Macksofy uses FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk) to express risk in financial terms — letting you compare a $4M expected loss against a $200K control investment with executive clarity.

Applicability
  • Boards needing quantitative risk for investment decisions
  • M&A due diligence (target-side or acquirer-side)
  • Pre-product-launch risk assessment
  • Annual risk-register update (ISO 27001 / NIST CSF)
  • Cyber insurance underwriting evidence
Standards & frameworks

Aligned to the regulations that matter.

FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk)
ISO 27005:2022
NIST SP 800-30
OCTAVE Allegro
Methodology

How we run a Risk Assessment engagement.

Interactive walkthrough — every phase clickable, every activity documented, every artefact regulator-ready.

PHASE0101Scoping02Threat modeling03Risk analysis04Control evaluati05Reporting
Phase 01 of 5

1 · Scoping

  • Asset + business process inventory
  • Critical risk areas identification
  • Quantitative vs qualitative scope split
Deliverables

Everything you need to satisfy auditors.

  • FAIR-quantified risk register
  • Board-level executive briefing
  • Investment prioritization matrix (ROI by control)
  • Tabletop scenarios (top 3 risks)
  • Annual update playbook
Recent engagements
Listed Indian Bank

Annual board-level risk assessment

Outcome: Quantified annual loss expectancy enabled $3M cyber-insurance premium negotiation

At a glance

The shape of a Risk Assessment engagement.

Every number below is grounded in how Macksofy actually runs the engagement — not aspirational marketing copy.

0
Methodology phases
0
Documented activities
0
Auditor-ready deliverables
0 day
Day retest window
Audit pillars

What we actually examine.

Each pillar is a distinct workstream inside the engagement — scoped, evidenced, and signed off independently before the audit pack is assembled.

18CONTROLS MAPPEDacross 6 pillars
Coverage breakdown
  • Asset & process inventory3 pts
  • Threat & vulnerability ID3 pts
  • Impact & likelihood scoring3 pts
  • Treatment plan3 pts
  • Residual risk acceptance3 pts
  • Continuous monitoring3 pts
Pillar 01
Asset & process inventory

You cannot rank risk on assets you do not know exist.

  • Critical business-process catalogue
  • Asset → process → data linkage
  • Crown-jewel + revenue-impact ranking
Pillar 02
Threat & vulnerability ID

Threat-modelling married to your real attack surface.

  • STRIDE / PASTA threat models
  • MITRE ATT&CK technique applicability
  • Vulnerability + misconfig baseline
Pillar 03
Impact & likelihood scoring

Quantified where possible, qualitative where appropriate.

  • Quantitative risk (₹ revenue / penalty exposure)
  • Qualitative likelihood (CIS-RAM aligned)
  • Sensitivity / what-if scenarios
Pillar 04
Treatment plan

Treat / transfer / accept / avoid — with evidence behind each call.

  • Per-risk treatment decision + owner
  • Control selection + effort estimate
  • Insurance & contractual transfer review
Pillar 05
Residual risk acceptance

Documented sign-off so the board has clarity, not surprises.

  • Residual risk register + tolerance bands
  • Executive / board sign-off pack
  • Trigger conditions for re-assessment
Pillar 06
Continuous monitoring

Risk is dynamic — your view of it should be too.

  • KRI / KPI dashboard
  • Quarterly recalibration cadence
  • Material-change re-assessment trigger
Engagement timeline

From kick-off to regulator-ready report.

The horizontal flow below shows the typical week-by-week shape of a Risk Assessment engagement. Click any station for detail in the methodology section above.

01
Week 1
Scoping
02
Week 2
Threat modeling
03
Week 3
Risk analysis
04
Week 4
Control evaluation
05
Week 5
Reporting
What clients say · Trusted India + UAE

Rated 4.9 ★ from 612 client reviews.

CERT-In Empanelled
Govt of India · MeitY
EC-Council ATC
Authorized Training
ISO 27001 Certified
Info Security Mgmt
We've worked with three Big 4 firms before Macksofy. None found what their team did in our payments stack. The most actionable report we've received in a decade.
AK
Aisha Khan
Information Security Manager · Listed Fintech · BKC, Mumbai
The CHFI training Macksofy delivered for our cyber cell raised investigation quality measurably. Practical, India-context-aware, and respectful of our operational realities.
IK
Inspector K. Joshi
Cyber Cell · Maharashtra Police · Mumbai
Came in with zero security background. 5 weeks later I was running Burp Suite and Metasploit confidently. Cleared CEH on the first attempt.
VI
Vivek Iyer
DevSecOps Lead · Healthcare SaaS · Hyderabad
FAQ

Things compliance leads ask before signing.

We default to FAIR for quantitative scenarios and ISO 27005 / NIST 800-30 for qualitative scope. Mix depends on stakeholder needs.
Talk to us

Get a fixed-price proposal in 48 hours.

Tell us about your security need — pentest, audit, training or a wider engagement. A senior consultant will reply within a few business hours.

CERT-In Empanelled
Information Security Auditor · India
  • CERT-In Empanelled
  • EC-Council ATC · CompTIA Authorized
  • 20,000+ professionals trained
  • India + UAE engagements
Human verification· Cloudflare Turnstile

By submitting this form you agree to be contacted by Macksofy. We typically respond within a few business hours and never share your details. Protected by Cloudflare Turnstile and rate limiting.